Loading...
Loading...
AI will not replace human SOC analysts.
The old L1 job where SOC analysts used to manually triage 200 alerts a shift, copy-paste IOCs into VirusTotal, and write the same incident note for the 18th time this week? Yes, that job is over.
But the analyst who understands this shift is about to become the most valuable person in the SOC. L1 analysts are upgrading from alert processors into AI supervisors and context analysts — the people who coach, validate, and direct AI systems operating at a scale no human team ever could.
This post breaks down exactly what this means for L1, L2, and L3 tiers, which skills will define your value, and how to position yourself before this transition happens to you rather than for you.
The average enterprise SOC receives 982 alerts per day. With a mean time to investigate (MTTI) of 70 minutes per alert, a single analyst would need to work 1,145 hours to clear one day's queue. That's 47 uninterrupted days.
Gartner projects that by 2028, AI will automate more than 50% of L1 SOC analyst responsibilities. The question was never whether change was coming. It was always: are your analysts ready to lead it, or be displaced by it?
Tier | SOC Analyst Today | AI SOC Agent |
L1 Analyst | Manual alert triage (100s/day) | Triage is automated. L1 analyst acts as AI supervisor & validator |
| IOC lookups & enrichment | Enrichment is automated. L1 Analyst reviews high-risk AI verdicts |
| Copy-paste incident templates | Analyst adds business context to ambiguous escalations |
| Shift-based, reactive coverage | AI Agent works 24x7 Analyst monitors AI coverage quality |
| Escalates ~30% of alerts | Reviews alerts where AI has “low confidence” in its conclusions |
L2 Analyst | Reactive deep-dive on L1 escalations | Proactive threat hunting |
| Constant alert-driven urgency | Detection engineering based on patters seen in AI processing |
| Writes & manages playbooks | Security architecture design |
| Rarely gets time for hunting | 0 playbooks to maintain |
L3 Analyst | 24/7 on-call involvement | Ad-hoc, exception-based |
| Pulled into routine escalations | Strategic oversight only |
The analysts who thrive in an AI SOC won't be the person who is fastest at manual triage. They'll be the best AI coaches. Here's the skill stack that matters:
AI DECISION AUDITING: You're not rubber-stamping AI outputs — you're interrogating them. Can you identify when an AI verdict lacks sufficient context? Can you spot when a "low-risk" classification was made on incomplete data? Skepticism is now a core job competency.
BUSINESS-CONTEXT ANALYST: AI can tell you an executive's account showed anomalous login behavior. Only you know that the CFO was traveling to Singapore last week and that they told IT about it on Slack. Business context is the analyst's true moat. It cannot be automated from a playbook — it lives in the organization's institutional memory, which you carry.
FEEDBACK LOOP MANAGEMENT: Modern AI SOCs improve continuously through analyst feedback on decisions. An analyst who gives precise, structured feedback trains the system faster and more accurately. Think of it as coaching a new employee — vague feedback produces vague improvement.
RISK-BASED AUTOMATION GOVERNANCE: When should AI auto-remediate vs. escalate? The analyst of 2026 needs to define and maintain those thresholds. This requires understanding both the technical risk of an action and its business consequence — suspending a VP of Engineering at 2 am during a product launch looks very different from suspending a contractor.
AI PROMPT ENGINEERING FOR SECURITY CONTEXT: The ability to ask the right questions, structure investigation requests accurately, and extract clean outputs from AI systems is becoming a competitive differentiator. Over 64% of cybersecurity job listings in 2026 already require AI/ML skills.
Most AI SOC conversations focus on the technology. The harder conversation is about the people and processes restructuring around it. Security leaders need honest answers to four questions:
HOW DO YOU EVALUATE ANALYSTS NOW? If your performance metrics are still "alerts closed per shift," you're measuring the old job. Restructure KPIs around AI oversight quality, escalation accuracy, and time-to-business-impact assessment.
WHAT DO YOU TELL CLIENT ORGANIZATIONS? MSSPs and service teams need to reframe SLAs — not around human analyst headcount but around AI coverage metrics: 100% alert triage, MTTR under 15 minutes, autonomous resolution rate >80%.
TRAIN VS. HIRE? Experienced analysts who understand your environment are worth retraining. They carry the tribal knowledge that AI ingests to build enterprise context. New hires without security fundamentals are a harder investment in an AI-augmented team.
WHAT'S THE "ANALYST AS COACH" CAREER PATH? Define it explicitly. L1 → AI Supervisor → AI Governance Lead → Detection Engineering Lead is a viable and growing track. Without a defined path, you'll lose your best analysts to companies that have one.
Repetitive triage at scale, investigating the same false positive pattern for the third time this week, writing incident reports that no one reads. These tasks were draining the people who chose security because they wanted to solve hard problems. AI SOC removes that burden.
What replaces it is genuinely harder and more engaging: governing AI systems, applying business judgment, hunting stealthy threats that evade automated detection, and designing the security architecture your organization will run on for the next decade.
If you're an analyst reading this, here's your three-step positioning plan:
STEP 1: Start auditing your current AI tools with the same skepticism you apply to alerts. Know their blind spots before anyone asks.
STEP 2: Document your team's tribal knowledge now — every undocumented process and exception is a future training asset for your AI SOC.
STEP 3: Ask your leadership for a defined AI governance role. If it doesn't exist yet, propose one. The analyst who builds that function also builds their career. The organizations that will win the next era of security aren't the ones with the most AI. They're the ones whose analysts know how to coach it.
Click here to know how to evaluate an AI SOC Agent
