Mate Security gives your SOC one more thing to own.
Simbian gives it one less.
Mate's Gamebooks are an investigation process your team migrates from its old playbooks, extends in plain language, and signs off on before it runs. Simbian's agents write and revise their own investigation skills, put every change through review with a before and after diff, and resolve 92% of alerts autonomously in production.
Talk to an AI SecOps ExpertIn production across 300+ enterprise environments
Both learn your environment. Only one keeps improving itself.
A durable model of the environment is the baseline for an AI SOC now. What separates the two platforms is who maintains the investigation process, whether the platform proposes its own corrections, and what else runs alongside the SOC.
What both do
- ●A durable environment model, not context rebuilt per alertBoth hold institutional knowledge that persists across investigations instead of reassembling it every time.
- ●Every alert investigated, with the evidence shownBoth reach a documented verdict and open the reasoning that produced it.
- ●Autonomy granted in stages, never switched onBoth keep humans in authority over what executes and widen scope as accuracy proves out.
- ●Knowledge that outlasts the analyst who leavesBoth capture why a decision was made, not only what was decided.
Where Simbian pulls ahead
- ▸No investigation process to author or migrateNothing to translate out of your old playbooks, extend in plain language, or approve before it runs.
- ▸A platform that proposes its own correctionsSimbian reads its own closed investigations, finds recurring blind spots, and writes the fix into the approval queue. In preview, and nothing applies until a human approves it.
- ▸Agent knowledge under version controlEvery change to what the agents know arrives as a request with a diff, an approver, and full history in Context Manager.
- ▸Offense and defense on one platformAn AI Pentest Agent proves which paths are exploitable, while the AI SOC and AI Threat Hunt Agents share one Context Lake.
Two architectures for the agentic SOC
One hands your team a process to keep current. The other keeps itself current, and puts every change through review.
