Security that gets better at beating your enemy, every run.
You set the objective. Simbian defends it across every tool you already run, marks its own work against that objective, and gets better at it every run. It has already fought thousands of AI attacks inside a war lab we built for the purpose.
In production across 300+ enterprise environments
Security for Winners
The LLM Security Test
Cyber Defense Benchmark
What “self-improving” actually means.
Designed to think, not just follow.
It handles alerts it has never seen before. No playbook required. Simbian reasons through it, and the investigation continues when reality goes off-script.
SOAR breaks on anything the playbook did not anticipate.
Every case teaches the next one.
When a pattern recurs, Simbian writes the proposed improvement itself and submits it for approval. A human approves before anything is applied.
Organization-wide persistent memory.
One model of your company: your assets and what each is worth, your identities and who they belong to, your processes, your runbooks, and every decision your team has already made. Built from your real data, it deepens with every case, and it stays yours.
We manufacture the training data ourselves.
Defense has no natural training set, so we build one. One AI attacks a company we invented, another defends, and we author both sides, which is why we know which action actually stopped it.
A model pointed at your SIEM was never trained to defend.
One alert improves four parts of your security.
A real threat gets a response, a tightened detection, and a closed path, and a false positive gets tuned down for good. When alerts cluster on one application, Simbian launches a pentest, and the proven exploit becomes a detection rule, a WAF rule that protects the path immediately, a network firewall rule, and the patch ticket.
It all starts in the war lab.
Simbian has already fought attacks no one has seen. Before it ever sees your environment it has been attacked and defended thousands of times, inside a company we built for the purpose.
We build a company, then attack it.
Defensive training data does not exist in nature, so we manufacture it. We build a synthetic company with its own people, machines, and daily traffic, then set two AIs fighting over it.
Then you choose the enemy to defeat.
Nobody buys defense in the abstract. Name the thing you cannot afford to lose.
Then Simbian marks its own work, and improves itself.
you choose which runs
Every sensor you already run.
EDR, SIEM, XDR, cloud, identity. Not just the alerts they raise, because an alert is a signal rather than a verdict, and the absence of one is not safety.
An objective at full marks does not get to drift.
It moves into a regression suite and is re-tested continuously, so improvement in one place cannot quietly cost you something in another.
There is no fixed schedule.
How often an objective is re-checked follows the work rather than a calendar. Something it is confident about is checked rarely, something it is unsure of is checked constantly, and you can ask it to check now.
Everything specific to you lives in the Context Lake.
The war lab teaches general defensive skill. What makes that defense yours is the memory Simbian builds of your environment — organization-wide, built from your real data, and it stays in your tenant.
Explore the Context Lake →Self-Improving Defense compounds into MITRE ATT&CK coverage.
Swipe the grid to see all 11 tactics →
Cycle 1: First campaign run.
We test six techniques. A hunt finds three already in your logs. Two of the six are detected. Three new detections ship, and one is tuned.
Cycle 2: The rules from cycle 1 are live.
We retest the original six plus three new techniques, and five of nine are now detected, with zero false positives. Four more rules ship.
Cycle 3: Red runs evasion variants.
Obfuscated payloads, exactly what breaks a rule written too narrowly. The rules hold. Ten of twelve are detected. Two remaining gaps close in the same cycle.






